Goebbelsian Islamic Tactics

Muslim scholars back Saudi call for interfaith dialogue

by: rick eichhorn | published: 08 15, 2008

A June 7, 2008, news release posted on middle-east-online.com was heralded with a Goebbelsian headline: Muslim scholars back Saudi call for interfaith dialogue. This very warm and fuzzy sounding concoction is meant to convey the idea that the Islamic scholars and the Saudis wish to encourage mutually beneficial dialogue. Simply put, there is nothing that could be further from the truth.

In the first paragraph, we are told that after a three-day meeting in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, the scholars ended their conference by suggesting there should be "efforts to boost dialogue with Christians and Jews." This "feel-good" statement from Mecca—the Islamic Holy City that forbids entrance to Christians and Jews, and all other infidels for that matter—rings hollow.

If there is a lack of dialogue, the Islamists' elitist attitude that results in such segregation is to blame. The statement is ambiguous as to whether the Islamists or the Christians and Jews should boost their efforts for dialogue. How can skepticism be avoided when such a statement issues forth from Mecca, where the Christians and Jews are specifically excluded, due to their "inherently inferior" natures as infidels.

There is also the question of what the dialogue's purpose will be. The scholars called for increased dialogue with the Christians and Jews... to what end? Is it that the scholars feel that Islamists need to better understand and appreciate the Christians and Jews, or is it that they feel the Christians and Jews need to better understand and appreciate the Islamists? Perhaps they mean both?

To answer the question of what the dialogue's purpose might be, only a modicum of knowledge about Islam is required. Sadly, for the vast majority of Americans and Westerners in general, even a small amount of knowledge about Islam is non-existent. How it is possible that universally so little is known about, arguably, the most important influence (other than money, itself) on world affairs today, is a topic for additional discovery. However, the fact is, if you ask the average American what they know about Islam, they will shrug their shoulders and say, "Not much," "Nothing," or "It's the religion of peace, right?"

When discussing Islam, either you are preaching to the choir or you are plowing fallow ground. If you are in the choir, keep singing. If you are unseeded with the truth, then the fertile soil of your mind has to be open to it, just as soil must be ripped open in order to receive seed.

Islam has always been and will always be about deception, dissembling, and death. Anything that Muhammad did to achieve his objectives automatically became the example of acceptable behavior expected of his followers. The one thing the uninitiated must understand is that the furtherance of Islam, by any means, is always the primary objective of Islamists. Period. If something is not of Islam, then it is undeserving of any respect to Islamists. Period.

In the article, the scholars also suggested creating a prize named after King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz for "figures and international organizations that contribute to advancing the dialogue in order to reach its objectives". The objectives are never specified in the article. It is important to clarify just what, exactly, the final objectives of any Islamic initiative might be. Based on the Qur'an, the objective must be to placate the non-Islamic participants into accepting an Islamic agenda, while encouraging the belief that such an acceptance is in the best interests of the non-Islamic participants. It must be the objective of all Islamic initiatives to further the goals of Islam, to the ultimate end of creating a world in which Islam is the only religion. Any means by which this master objective is accomplished is justified and encouraged in the Qur'an, and especially in the Hadith (collections of stories about Muhammad by his contemporaries).

The king was also urged to assemble Christian, Jewish, and Muslim experts "to agree on a format for a fruitful world dialogue that would contribute to solving problems faced today by mankind." In the Islamist worldview, of course, the only real problem facing mankind is that the world has not yet fully embraced Islamic doctrine and submitted to the will of Allah. The peace of Allah can only exist when Allah and his Messenger are accepted as the only source of truth and law.

Eventually, some of the dialogue's objectives are mentioned, such as creating the "correct picture of Islam" and reconciliation with "other sects of Islam, which will lead to uniting the nation." The "correct picture of Islam" in this case would be anything but the true picture of Islam. The "correct picture" would be a picture which portrays Islam as benign and peaceful, something that has never been true.

Reconciliation with other sects of Islam to unite the "nation" means to unite the Islamic nation against any and all other non-believing nations—it does not mean to unite with infidels. The need to unite is corollary to the imperative in the Qur'an to convert the whole world to Islam. To unite ultimately would mean the recreation of the Islamic Caliphate, a centralized Theo-political hierarchy historically responsible for the expansion of the Islamic state. The Caliphate would be headed by a caliph, one man responsible for the spiritual needs of Islam, such as second Caliph U'mar, who personally beat one of his own sons to death, after the son had already been beaten for allegedly drinking alcohol. U'mar was just another in the long line of Islam's compassionate Holy Men. Of course U'mar was assassinated, but so was the third caliph, and the fourth caliph...

"The difference between nations in beliefs and cultures are God's will, so they should use their common values as a base for cooperation that would be for their benefit," the statement said.

Monotheism, which Islam purports to advocate, is a value common to the Jewish and Christian faiths. In the Qur'an, Muhammad teaches his followers that the Jews have assigned the Holy Spirit as a partner to Allah, and as such, the Jews are practicing polytheism. Muhammad also describes Christianity in the same way, ascribing the belief in the Trinity as a triune of polytheism. Islam teaches that Allah has no need of any partners, and that the Jews and the Christians have deliberately perverted Allah's instruction by inventing the Holy Spirit and Jesus. Since the concept of monotheism is central to all three beliefs, the Jewish and Christian infidels should use that common value as a basis for understanding that Islam is the truth and convert to Islam. Converting to Islam would be to their benefit.

Lest there be any confusion among the Islamic true believers, the scholars went out of their way to insist that did not mean abandoning their principles and their religion's fundamentals. This is simply a proclamation to any Islamist concerned that Islamic values are being watered down, that the ultimate objective of world domination by Islam is still operative.

The release statement said further that "constructive dialogue and peaceful coexistence and cooperation between the followers of (God's) messages and others does not mean abandoning the axioms, or giving up the religion fundamentals." Notice how that statement quietly separates the world into "followers of (God's) messages," and "others." The Qur'an charges all followers of Islam with the duty to defeat infidels by any means at their disposal. Deceptive, dissembling statements are the "sheep's clothing" of peaceful overtures that conceal the snarling wolf of Islamic world domination, the "religion fundamentals" underneath.

The scholars appealed to the Mecca-based Muslim League hosting the conference to convene an international Islamic committee to construct a common strategy for the dialogue. Mission Objective: Discover how can we fool the infidels today, as we infiltrate their societies and eat them out from within.

To underscore the need for Islamic solidarity, King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz allowed Shiite Iranian politician Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani to attend the conference, seated at Abdullah's left as a gesture of unity between the two major sects within Islam. The Saudis represent the Sunnis, and the Iranians represent the Shiites.

The Saudis are Arab, while the Iranians are Persian, or non-Arab. As an Iranian, Rafsanjani represents the strongest non-Arab Islamist state. As such, the union between the Iranians and the Saudis (Arabs) represents the spearhead of the third wave of Islamic expansionism.

The first wave ended in AD 732, when Charles "The Hammer" Martel defeated the Islamic thrust from Spain (al Andalus) in the Battle of Tours. The second wave of Islamic expansion ended at the Battle of Vienna, after Vienna had been besieged by the Ottoman Empire for two months. It took an alliance of Polish, Austrian, and German forces to defeat the Ottoman army. The Battle of Vienna took place on September 11, 1683.

It is interesting that none of the major news outlets (or any other news source, for that matter) has driven home that fact. It might be alarming, I suppose, if the Western Infidels knew that September 11th was deliberately chosen to decree the beginning of the third wave of Islamic expansionism. The dialogue might become bogged down in the details of the truth... if it were to become widely known.     

add a comment