Conservative Book Club - Conservative Crusader

They Disturbing Limits of Modern Discourse

by: paul driessen | published: 08 10, 2009

Share |
 

Bill O'Reilly continues his harangue that conservatives should just drop the Obama birth certificate controversy. From where I sit, health care, the deficit and cash-for-clunkers dominate the conservative agenda. While it may round out the top ten, the most talk I'm hearing about Obama's birth certificate is from the No Spin-meister himself. On the same episode, Juan Williams chided conservatives for "going after" Sonia Sotomayor and labeling her a racist.

Does anyone notice a pattern here? American political discourse is about as deep as a birdbath. Most conservatives try to launch serious national debates on serious issues, occasionally even gaining traction, but the voices from the town square keep nagging us, like pesky little do-gooders: "You can't say that!"

And they're coming from the conservative side, too. Dennis Miller recently, also on the O'Reilly Factor, advised that Republicans should just let Sotomayor sail through confirmation. Since she is replacing a liberal justice, he reasons, we could avoid alienating Hispanics and save political capital for the next high court appointment. In 2008, of course, candidate John McCain tiptoed around Barack Obama's ties to radicals. Colin Powell, who, by the way, supported Obama, recently appeared on Larry King Live, battling Rush Limbaugh for the title of de facto voice of the GOP. The environmental left, as we know, has declared the global warming debate over, and some skeptics have been compared to Holocaust deniers, illustrating the left's tactic, which we employ against ourselves, not to foster spirited debate but to squelch it. In this week's National Review cover story, Maggie Gallagher notes that conservative radio hosts are nervous about discussing gay marriage. Few, if any, have rallied support for fellow host Michael Savage, either, who has been banned from England solely for his political speech. Didn't conservative talk radio used to be afraid of nothing?

One could argue that free speech is finite. There are too many voices shouting in the public square and each side has to pick its battles. Furthermore, if conservatives are not advancing a coherent, passionate agenda, then it's their own fault.

Which is exactly the point. Conservatives must set their own agenda and pick their battles according to what is right and not by the prevailing passions of the dominant political culture. Opposing Sotomayor for her rhetoric and her record is the right thing to do. She should answer for her words -- Republicans need not answer for bringing them up. More precious air time wasted arguing procedure and ground rules. . .

Political debate in this country is cautious and uninspiring. Most of us long to hear the conservative extremists of the liberals' imaginations, having suffered the excruciating congeniality of Bob Dole, President Bush 43, John McCain and the litany of commentators tiptoeing around the peripheries of any given issue. A number of fine commentators and writers breathe fire, but it is the base the is propelling modern conservatism. The most rousing words from the Monday night news shows were clips of town hall meetings, particularly one from Philadelphia where a woman confronted Sen. Arlen Specter and HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius (and I'm paraphrasing): "Medicare and Social Security are going broke, cash-for-clunkers is a joke, and yet you expect us to trust you with our health care." What her words lacked in originality, she more than made up for with conviction.

Other town-hallers mention the Constitution and the proper role of government, which means they get it. A common lament is that nastiness and mudslinging are ruining our political process, and, while not untrue, a greater harm is a citizenry lulled into complacency by flat, predictable dialogue. The Fairness Doctrine and speech codes are no less stifling than the muzzles we place on ourselves, usually in the name of civility, which is fine in theory, but the truth, as they say, isn't always pretty. Our founders knew it, and the American people, now waking up with a vengeance, know it.

 
 
 
add a comment



 

Original Comment

 




TOP TEN MOST LEFT-BIASED AMERICAN JOURNALISTS
 
By:
Warner Todd Huston

Neil Stenberg Chicago Sun-Times10: NEIL STEINBERG
Chicago Sun-Times

Liz Sidoti Associated Press9: LIZ SIDOTI
Associated Press

Christiane Amanpour CNN8: CHRISTIANE AMANPOUR
CNN

Howard Fineman Newsweek7: HOWARD FINEMAN
Newsweek

Rick Sanchez CNN6: RICK SANCHEZ
CNN

Cynthia Tucker Atlanta Journal-Constitution5: Cynthia Tucker
Atlanta Journal Constitution

Chuck Todd NBC News4: Chuck Todd
NBC

Paul Krugman New York Times3: Paul Krugman
The New York Times

Joe Klein Time Magazine2: Joe Klein
Time Magazine

Helen Thomas UPI / Independent1: Helen Thomas
UPI / Independent

Tea Dump
 
Thousands of Deadly Islamic Terror Attacks Since 9/11
 
Renew America
 
 
Paul Driessen Articles

Paul Driessen

32 articles
follow me:

 

Paul Driessen is senior policy adviser for the Congress of Racial Equality, Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow and Center for the Defense of Free Enterprise, and author of Eco-Imperialism: Green Power - Black Death, which documents the harm that restrictive environmental policies often have on poor people, especially in developing countries. He writes and speaks frequently on energy, environmental, economic development, malaria eradication, human rights, global warming and corporate social responsibility issues. His website is www.Eco-Imperialism.com.

VIEW ALL ARTICLES

 
recent articles

They Destroyed My Towers!

by: alan caruba | 09 10, 2010

9-11 Hero John O'Neill: The Counterterrorist Who Defied Washington Elites

"Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends." John 15:13.

by: jim kouri | 09 10, 2010

Culture Challenge of the Week: “Imperfect” Children

by: rebecca hagelin | 09 09, 2010

NOVEMBER 2nd A RISING STORM

by: bruce nix | 09 09, 2010

Is burning the Quran bigotry?

Only an uncritical mind would claim that all beliefs deserve tolerance.

by: barrett kalellis | 09 09, 2010

MORE ARTICLES

HOME | ABOUT US | SITE MAP | CONTACT US | LOGIN

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of ConservativeCrusader.com, it's editorial staff or it's publisher. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact us for a link request to ConservativeCrusader.com. ConservativeCrusader.com is not affiliated with any of the alphabet media organizations. ConservativeCrusader.com is a group of non-compensated, independent writers bringing common sense commentary to the public in the midst of the mainstream media's blatant liberal bias.

Copyright 2008 Conservative Crusader Trademarks belong to their respective owners. All rights reserved.