The Left Hates the Innocence of Children

by: tim dunkin | published: 09 21, 2014

Absolutely, utterly, unquestionably, lamppost-hanging-worthily despicable. This is the only way to describe the news that greeted a jaded, yet somehow still horrified, world last month when revelations of child sexual trafficking on a massive scale were revealed to have taken place in Rotherham, England between 1997 and 2013. The victims were over 1400 white, working class girls who were systematically “groomed” to be sex slaves by Pakistani immigrants, being unspeakably abused by these filthy Islamic dogs so that they could be used as underage prostitutes, each girl being worth over $300,000 a year to her tormentors.

As horrifying as this is, the story only gets worse. Throughout the period in which this was taking place, evidence was presented to the local police that this was going on. Yet, the police consistently turned a blind eye out of fear of being labeled “racist” – because the perpetrators were a protected minority, Muslim Pakistanis, who are basically allowed to do whatever they like by the UK’s left-wing establishment.

It’s bad enough that a bunch of Pakistanis were doing this to innocent children for so long. You tend to expect this sort of thing from people who idolize a “prophet” who raped his 9-year old “wife,” according to their own canonical additions to the Qur’an. It’s another thing altogether for supposedly civilized Westerners to essentially aid and abet this barbaric behavior because of concerns about being “politically correct.”

As James Delingpole informs us, Rotherham is only the tip of the iceberg for this sort of thing, however. This has been going on in England for at least 25 years, the first recorded case of it being brought to the public’s attention in 1989 – when the fathers of the victims were put on trial for dealing with the perpetrators when the police refused to do so. Other countries in Europe have seen the same type of thing happening wherever significant numbers of Muslim immigrants reside. Many places in Europe, including Sweden and other Scandinavian countries, suffer from a “rape jihad” in which Muslim immigrants force themselves on native women as a way of degrading them and “proving” the superiority of Islam. Even here in the United States, states like Minnesota, Ohio, and Colorado, in which large populations of Somalis, Iraqis, and other groups from Islamic nations have settled, have seen spikes in their crime rates, especially sexual assaults and rapes. Of course, ISIS terrorists in the Middle East have explicitly declared a “rape jihad” against Christian and other non-Muslim women in the areas they have conquered.

So why is none of this generally known? Why are the news media not reporting on this? The answer is because doing so would run counter to the ideological narrative held by the vast majority of the left-wingers in the media. See, in their worldview, Westerners, Christians, whites, can never be victims. They are the oppressors. They are the ones who hurt other people, not the other way around. Muslims and racial minorities are always and at all times the victims. So when stories like Rotherham and the rape jihad come up, they are quietly swept under the rug by the “progressives” in our society because maintaining the integrity of the left-wing self-contained fact space is more important than the fact that thousands of women are being raped and abused worldwide by members of a “progressive-approved” protected class.

In other words, those on the Left who refuse to speak out against this are rape-enablers, nothing more than de facto pimps (both figuratively and literally) for child rapists worldwide.

Oh, and from their near-universal silence on this issue, it can fairly be said that feminists have completely lost what little shred of credibility they might have still had. They’ll squeal and squawk about Todd Akin misspeaking about “legitimate rape” or about only being paid 80% of the wage for doing 80% of the work, but when something REAL comes up, something where thousands of women are really, actually, genuinely being abused in the worst possible ways – crickets. Their silence makes them complicit – and it’s all the worse because their silence exists because for them, ideological solidarity is more important than principles and humanity.

The Left hates innocence. They cannot stand the thought that somebody might be untainted by the filth and degradation of this fallen world. It positively drives many on the Left to distraction to think that somewhere, in some place, there might be a child who is being taught godly standards, purity, and self-respect by their parents or others.

How else do you explain the fact that the cultural Left has given, and continues to give, cover and protection to a known child molester like Roman Polanski? A man who defiled a thirteen-year old girl when he was 45. A man who fled the country because he didn’t want to face the consequences of his crime, was given a safe haven by left-wing European nations, and who has received the support of numerous petitions by his fellow Hollywood progressives calling for authorities to drop the charges against him? How do you explain Jimmy Savile, the BBC television show host who got away with sexually abusing over 500 children (among other things), because he was a big-shot progressive television personality?

Should we be surprised that the progressives who run New Zealand’s public school system are attempting to introduce a new, and extremely explicit, sex education program aimed at 5-12 year old children? What kind of a sicko thinks that 5-year old children should be learning the “nuts and bolts” of sexual intercourse and that they should be exposed to a detailed knowledge of condoms and human sexual anatomy?

“Progressives,” that’s who.

The same people who think schools should be teaching children that homosexuality is “normal” and “healthy,” even though scripture, biology, and epidemiology all unite in proclaiming this to be false.

The same people who, in Sweden’s public education system since the 1970s, actively encouraged children to sexually “experiment” with each other, even going so far as to make social outcasts out of those kids who wouldn’t go along with it.

Oh, and just so you know, left-wingers here in America are already hard at work bringing this same kind of “sex ed” into our schools here. As usual, Calipornia is leading the way.

This is a pattern that goes at least as far back as 1919, when Georg Lukacs, a Hungarian Communist, got control of that nation’s educational system and started using it to destroy “traditional sexual morality” among Hungary’s youth.

All of this leads us to the present day and the current left-wing insouciance toward third-world animals running a child sex trafficking ring right smack in the middle of what formerly was one of the most advanced, enlightened, and humane nations on earth. Why does it seem that the left-wingers who run much of the cultural, bureaucratic, and governmental apparatus in the United Kingdom care more about protecting the sensibilities of an ethnic and religious minority, even when its members are committing and helping to cover up a vile, disgusting act of inhuman barbarity, than they do about protecting innocent young girls? Why does it seem like left-wingers here in America are more interested in protecting perverts with unnatural and unconscionable proclivities than they are in protecting the innocence and purity of our children?

If it seems so, it is because it IS so. Those on the Left hate it when children retain their purity and innocence. Which is why it is all the more necessary that we as parents do everything we can to protect our children. If that means getting them out of the publik skoolz, then so be it. If it means getting rid of the television and the movies, then so be it. If it means having to go so far – which may well be the case one day – of breaking laws to keep our children out of the hands of overzealous “child welfare officers,” then so be it. Don’t let the Left have your kids. Protect them. Preserve them.

add a comment