Arizona Fighting Back Against Obama Onslaught
by: jim kouri | published: 07 20, 2010
Department of Homeland Security and Department of Defense today announced that National Guard deployments to the Southwest border will begin on August 1 "to combat the transnational criminal organizations that smuggle weapons, cash and people across our Southwest border."
Critics claim this is nothing more than a replay of the Bush dog and pony show when he deployed Guardsmen at the border with rules of non-engagement. The troops performed clerical duties, answered telephones and acted as security guards ordered to only observe and report.
Meanwhile, President Barack Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder have not backed from their threats against the state of Arizona.
Last Thursday, public-interest attorneys filed a "motion to intervene" on behalf of Arizona State Senator Russell Pearce, author of Arizona’s new illegal immigration law SB 1070, in the Obama Justice Department lawsuit challenging the law, which is set to take effect on July 29.
According to the Judicial Watch, the court filing was made “to further the interests of his legislative district and all citizens of Arizona, Senator Pearce authored SB 1070. On January 13, 2010, Senator Pearce introduced SB 1070 into the Arizona Senate. Over several months, Senator Pearce worked with his colleagues to enact a statutory scheme that made SB 1070 the public policy of all state and local government agencies in Arizona. Senator Pearce was the chief sponsor of SB 1070 and voted in favor of its passage. Senator Pearce’s efforts came to fruition when Governor Brewer signed SB 1070 and HB 2762 into law. As the author and driving force behind the enactment of SB 1070, Senator Pierce has the right to defend it.”
Meanwhile, in another disgraceful example of the Obama Administration’s hostility toward enforcing illegal immigration law the Obama Justice Department announced this week that illegal immigration sanctuary cities can continue their illegal behavior without fear of prosecution.
According to Newsmax,com, “A week after suing Arizona and arguing that the state’s immigration law creates a patchwork of rules, the Obama administration said it will not go after so-called sanctuary cities that refuse to cooperate with the federal government on immigration enforcement, on the grounds that they are not as bad as a state that ‘actively interferes."
"In other words, protecting American citizens from criminal aliens is ripe for federal condemnation and legal action, but aiding and abetting criminal aliens is ignored at best, applauded at worst by the Obama Justice Department," said former New York police detective Mike Snopes.
On April 23, 2010, Arizona Governor Jan Brewer signed into law the legislation authored by State Sen. Pearce that, among other provisions, makes it a crime to be in the State of Arizona without proper documentation. State Sen. Pearce crafted the language in the bill consistent with federal law. However, the Obama Justice Department filed a lawsuit challenging the law and requesting a preliminary injunction preventing the law from being enforced.
State Senator Pearce issued the following statement on his legal effort to defend SB 1070: “The purpose of SB 1070 is to protect the citizens of Arizona from the devastating and deadly impact of rampant illegal immigration. And it is outrageous that the Obama administration would attack Arizona for simply protecting its own citizens, especially when it has failed so miserably to do its constitutional duty and secure the border. This is a legal battle of epic proportions."
Sen. Pearce's statement goes on to say: "As a Senator in a state on the frontlines, I see firsthand the damage being done to our state and our country. What happens here in Arizona will impact every state in the country interested in protecting its citizens by enforcing the rule of law. We are a nation of laws. We must have the courage — the fortitude — to enforce, with compassion but without apology, those laws that protect the integrity of our borders and the rights of our lawful citizens.”
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton issued the following statement on the new push to defend SB 1070: "Our work to defend SB 1070 for Senator Pearce may be the most important piece of litigation that Judicial Watch has undertaken in its 16 year history. In many ways, this comes down to a fight between those who want to enforce the law and those who do not."
"The Obama White House wants to kill this law because it does not want to bear its constitutional responsibility to secure the border and enforce the law. We are proud to stand with Arizona State Sen. Pearce, Governor Brewer and the citizens of Arizona in support of the rule of law,” said Fitton.
comments
-
Benito J.
add a comment
action items!
Republican Leaders in Pennsylvania Hold the Key to School Choice Reform
05 29, 2011
Tell Your Representative to Vote YES on H.R. 1229 Putting the Gulf of Mexico Back to Work Act
05 29, 2011
Stop The Internet Sales Tax
05 13, 2011
Ask Sen. McConnell to Appoint Sen. DeMint to Senate Finance Committee
05 13, 2011
Force the Senate to End the UNLIMITED Obamacare Slush Fund
05 13, 2011
popular articles
Why Not Santorum?
by: lisa fabrizio |
04, 28 2011
B. HUSSEIN OBAMA: 'I will stand with the Muslims. . .
by: j. grant swank, jr |
07, 01 2008
Obama's Healthcare Rules Will Shut Down Catholic Hospitals Nationwide
by: warner todd huston |
10, 12 2010
Will Newt Gingrich Win the Republican Nomination?
by: selwyn duke |
11, 08 2011
UPDATE: Obama Georgia Ballot Eligibility Hearing
by: sher zieve |
01, 30 2012




I hope that every American, regardless of where he lives, will stop and examine his conscience about this and other related incidents. This Nation was founded by men of many nations and backgrounds. It was founded on the principle that all men are created equal, and that the rights of every man are diminished when the rights of one man are threatened. All of us ought to have the right to be treated as he would wish to be treated, as one would wish his children to be treated, but this is not the case.
I know the proponents of this law say that the majority approves of this law, but the majority is not always right. Would women or non-whites have the vote if we listen to the majority of the day, would the non-whites have equal rights (and equal access to churches, housing, restaurants, hotels, retail stores, schools, colleges and yes water fountains) if we listen to the majority of the day? We all know the answer, a resounding, NO!
As for the undocumented workers, as was attributed to Ronald Reagan “It’s the Economy, Stupid”. When the economy is good you say let’s all celebrate “Cinco de Mayo, my brothers” but when the economy is down “it’s all your fault, you damn immigrant”. This too will pass, the real problem is the narcos, arms and people smugglers and that’s what the focus should be on.
Today we are committed to a worldwide struggle to promote and protect the rights of all who wish to be free. In a time of domestic crisis men of good will and generosity should be able to unite regardless of party or politics and do what is right, not what is just popular with the majority. Some men comprehend discrimination by never have experiencing it in their lives, but the majority will only understand after it happens to them.